"Obama's
Legacy Forecast, Cloudy with Occasional Racism"
It's obvious that anti-patriotic Barack Obama and his, "for the
first time in my adult life I am proud of my country"
Wife, both seem to be influenced by their racist anti-American
"God damn
America" Pastor.
Like
the old saying goes, "birds of a feather flock
together"...
The
APFTE suspects that the Obamas have a streak of racism and
anti-patriotism ingrained in them as well, or they wouldn't have
continued to follow the "Racist Anti-American Pastor" the
way they have for the last 20 years or so.
Think about this...
How long would it take yourself to find another Pastor to follow,
if vile racist hatred and anti-American sentiment spewed from his
anti-patriotic mouth?
How long would you put up with it?
Twenty years? One hour? Ten Minutes? Most loyal Americans
wouldn't listen to his garbage for more than a single minute before
taking some action. But I'm not writing about normal
Americans. I writing about anti-American scumbags that would
like to control our government and with that, control our lives...
Obama
claims he will change America, well he was a politician in Illinois
and didn't change a thing in all the years he was there, why would
anyone expect an change for good to occur if he was President?
Illinois has one of the most corrupt State Governments in the USA. And
he was part of it.
He
has not once crossed the aisle in the U.S. Congress to help with a
Republican bill and has the most liberal voting record in Washington
DC.
Is
he saying he's going to change himself first before becoming
President? Or is the change he's going to strive for is a change to
total liberal rule in the White House?
The
APFTE recalls learning of a lawsuit a few years ago... It was filed
against an Illinois State College by a White Student that was told she
wasn't allowed to partake in a certain college architectural course because it was
reserved for Black Students Only and being White she was barred from
taking the course.
Can you even begin to visualize the uproar
and protests that would occur if any State College barred a Black
Student from taking a course for the same reason?
Surely all the
"show-boater/media-whore" regulars like Jessie, Sharpie and
the other parasites would be clamoring for a spot in front of the news cameras
right next to the most popular Liberal Democratic Politicians!
Except
that this case was only about a White Student being racially
discriminated against... no big deal right? She deserved
it, because she was born White, and we all know that according to the Affirmative
Action Laws she has to pay for what some White people did 100, 150,
200 years ago right? You know that's a wrong idea and bad law.
When
Barack Obama was asked about the lawsuit by a major Chicago newspaper,
he stated as eloquently and as statesman like as he could in his bold
convincing rhetorical voice, that he supported the colleges Blacks
only classes and didn't see any problem with them.
What's
next Mr. Obama? "Blacks Only Drinking Fountains" in
Illinois Colleges?
The hypocrisy and double standards are
blatant.
If
Obama is going to continue to point out potential racism and
discrimination against Blacks, while the law of the land actually
condones discrimination and racism against White Citizens, he should
also champion the eventual "Equal Rights For Whites" as well.
He
probably won't though, because then he might lose the support from
many of the 96%
or so of all Black Voters that are voting for him just because he's
Black...
That
voting by the way, is also racial discrimination on a
massive scale. Whoever said Blacks can't be racist better have their
head examined.
Can
Barack
Obama be a racist hypocrite, in the same way as his Pastor that he
admires so much is? Perhaps he is, but finding out for sure
after he's the President is a truly bad idea.
After
all... how many Presidents in American history hung around with an America Hating
Racist Pastor for over 20 years that they adored and believed in
before attaining the Office? The only reason Obama seems to
be mad at his Pastor is because he couldn't control him and get him to
shut his racist anti-American mouth while he was trying to con the
American People into getting elected President.
Obama
does not deserve to be the President, and never has.
Now
if we could only get patriots like Condi Rice or Colin Powell to
run... that's the ticket!
By
R. Smith, APFTE
A
Picture Is Worth A Thousand Words!
It
sure looks like Barack
Hussein Obama failed to say the pledge of allegiance respectfully or even symbolically
place his hand over his heart... staunch Obama cult members will
say otherwise... don't you believe it though! Is this the kind of
"American" you want as President of the United States?
The Members
of the APFTE expect no one except the most patriotic type of Citizen
as U.S. President. After all, if we're going to scrape the
bottom of the "anti-patriot" barrel with Obama... why not
just have Anti-American Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or maybe
Syrian President Bashar al-Asad or even Venezuelan President Hugo
Chavez living in the White House instead?
At least
they're honest enough to admit openly that they dislike the USA, and
want to adjust it more to their taste, unlike
Presidential hopeful Barak Hussein Obama.
Even
Obama's wife claimed that “People in this country are ready for
change and hungry for a different kind of politics and… for the
first time in my adult life I am proud of my country because it feels
like hope is finally making a comeback.”
Just maybe
because her "Hubby" is wishing and hoping his way into gullible
peoples minds and into the Presidency?
Obama's
wife was born in 1964, meaning her adult life began in 1982.
After
going to two top notch Colleges, after living a Millionaires lifestyle
much of her adult life, after witnessing the end of the cold war, witnessing
Republicans offering other people of her race positions on the highest
court, Office of Secretary Of State and other previously unobtainable
positions of prestige, Obama's wife, our next potential First Lady is
now finally feeling proud to be an American? Go figure!!!!
Don't
settle for an "Anti-Patriot" in the Oval Office. Save
your support for a Patriotic American.
Besides,
the only "Change" that's going to occur if Obama gets
elected will be the "change" that's left in your wallets
after he raises our taxes!
If characters from "The Hills" were to emote about race, I
imagine it would sound like B. Hussein Obama's autobiography,
"Dreams From My Father."
Has anybody read this book? Inasmuch as the book reveals Obama to be a
flabbergasting lunatic, I gather the answer is no.
Obama is about to
be our next president: You might want to take a peek.
(If only
the German people
had read "Mein Kampf"...)
Nearly every page -- save the ones dedicated to cataloguing the
mundane details of his life -- is bristling with anger at some imputed
racist incident. The last time I heard this much race-baiting
invective I was ... in my usual front-row pew, as I am every Sunday
morning, at Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago.
Obama tells a story about taking two white friends from the high
school basketball team to a "black party." Despite their
deep-seated, unconscious hatred of blacks, the friends readily
accepted. At the party, they managed not to scream the N-word, but
instead "made some small talk, took a couple of the girls out on
the dance floor."
But with his racial hair-trigger, Obama sensed the whites were not
comfortable because "they kept smiling a lot." And then, in
an incident reminiscent of the darkest days of the Jim Crow South ...
they asked to leave after spending only about an hour at the party! (It
was practically an etiquette lynching!)
So either they hated black people with the hot, hot hate of a thousand
suns, or they were athletes who had come to a party late, after a
Saturday night basketball game.
In the car on the way home, one of the friends empathizes with Obama,
saying: "You know, man, that really taught me something. I mean,
I can see how it must be tough for you and Ray sometimes, at school
parties ... being the only black guys and all."
And thus Obama felt the cruel lash of racism! He actually writes that
his response to his friend's perfectly lovely remark was: "A part
of me wanted to punch him right there."
Listen, I don't want anybody telling Obama about Bill Clinton's
"I feel your pain" line.
Wanting to punch his white friend in the stomach was the introductory
anecdote to a full-page psychotic rant about living by "the white
man's rules."
(One rule he missed was: "Never punch out your
empathetic white friend after dragging him to a crappy all-black
party.")
Obama's gaseous disquisition on the "white man's rules"
leads to this charming crescendo: "Should you refuse this defeat
and lash out at your captors, they would have a name for that, too, a
name that could cage you just as good. Paranoid. Militant. Violent.
Nigger."
For those of you in the "When is Obama gonna play the 'N-word'
card?" pool, the winner is ... Page 85! Congratulations!
When his mother expresses concern about Obama's high school friend
being busted for drugs, Obama says he patted his mother's hand and
told her not to worry.
This, too, prompted Obama to share with his readers a life lesson on
how to handle white people: "It was usually an effective tactic,
another one of those tricks I had learned: People were satisfied so
long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They
were more than satisfied, they were relieved -- such a pleasant
surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry
all the time."
First of all, I note that this technique seems to be the basis of
Obama's entire presidential campaign. But moreover -- he was talking
about his own mother!
As Obama says:
"Any distinction between
good and bad whites held negligible meaning." Say, do you think a
white person who said that about blacks would be a leading
presidential candidate?
The man is stark bonkersville.
He says the reason black people keep to themselves is that it's
"easier than spending all your time mad or trying to guess
whatever it was that white folks were thinking about you."
Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking
about you. Especially WASPs.
We think everybody is inferior, and we
are perfectly charming about it.
In college, Obama explains to a girl why he was reading Joseph
Conrad's 1902 classic, "Heart of Darkness": "I read the
book to help me understand just what it is that makes white people so
afraid. Their demons. The way ideas get twisted around. I helps me
understand how people learn to hate."
By contrast, Malcolm X's autobiography "spoke" to Obama. One
line in particular "stayed with me," he says. "He spoke
of a wish he'd once had, the wish that the white blood that ran
through him, there by an act of violence, might somehow be
expunged."
Forget
Rev. Jeremiah Wright -- Wright is Booker T. Washington compared to
this guy!
By Ann
Coulter, April 2, 2008. Visit
Ann's website soon! LINK
Black
Panther Party Chased Away By Supporters Of Joe Horn In Pasadena Texas.
Joe Horn
Protects Neighbors property and Neighborhood with deadly
force. LINK
The APFTE believes
that all law abiding Citizens have the right to protect their lives
and property from any criminal element, regardless of whether the
criminals are illegal aliens or not.
Furthermore,
protecting your Neighbors property is just the Patriotic American
thing to do.
"IMPORTING
A SLAVE CLASS"
Apparently, my position on immigration is
that we must deport all 12 million illegal aliens immediately,
inasmuch as this is billed as the only alternative to immediate
amnesty. The jejune fact that we "can't deport them all" is
supposed to lead ineluctably to the conclusion that we must grant
amnesty to illegal aliens — and fast!
I'm astounded that debate has sunk so low that I need to type the
following words, but: No law is ever enforced 100 percent.
We can't catch all rapists, so why not grant amnesty to rapists?
Surely no one wants thousands of rapists living in the shadows! How
about discrimination laws? Insider trading laws? Do you expect Bush to
round up everyone who goes over the speed limit? Of course we can't do
that. We can't even catch all murderers. What we need is
"comprehensive murder reform." It's not "amnesty"
— we'll ask them to pay a small fine.
If it's "impossible" to deport illegal aliens, how did we
come to have so much specific information about them? I keep hearing
they are Catholic, pro-life, hardworking, just dying to become
American citizens, and will take jobs other Americans won't. Someone
must have talked to them to gather all this information. Let's find
that guy — he must know where they are!
How do we even know there are 12 million of them? Why not 3 million,
or 40 million? Maybe we should put the guy who counted them in charge
of deporting them.
If the 12-million figure is an extrapolation based on the number of
illegal immigrants in public schools or emergency rooms and
well-manicured lawns in Brentwood, then shouldn't we be looking for
them at schools and hospitals and well-manicured lawns in Brentwood?
I believe that the shortage of unskilled, non-English-speaking
Mexicans we experienced in the '60s has been remedied by now.
Since Teddy Kennedy's 1965 Immigration Act, more than half of all
legal immigrants have been unskilled, non-English-speaking Mexicans.
America takes in roughly 1 million legal immigrants each year. Only
about 30,000 of them have Ph.D.s. Why on earth would any rational
immigration policy discriminate against immigrants with Ph.D.s in
favor of unskilled, non-English-speaking immigrants?
Say, don't Ph.D.s and other skilled workers have more influence on
government policy than unskilled workers? Aren't they more likely to
bend a president's ear? Yes, I believe they are! Noticeably, the
biggest proponents of the government's policy of importing a huge
underclass of unskilled workers are not themselves unskilled workers.
The great bounty of cheap labor by unskilled immigrants isn't going to
hardworking Americans who hang drywall or clean hotel rooms — and
who are having trouble getting jobs, now that they're forced to
compete with the vast influx of unskilled workers who don't pay taxes.
The people who make arguments about "jobs Americans won't
do" are never in a line of work where unskilled immigrants can
compete with them. Liberals love to strike generous, humanitarian
poses with other people's lives.
Something tells me the immigration debate would be different if we
were importing millions of politicians or Hollywood agents. You
lose your job, while I keep my job at the Endeavor agency, my Senate
seat, my professorship, my editorial position or my presidency. (And I
get a maid!)
The only beneficiaries of these famed
hardworking immigrants — unlike you lazy Americans — are the
wealthy, who want the cheap labor while making the rest of us chip in
for the immigrants' schooling, food and health care.
These great lovers of the downtrodden — the downtrodden trimming
their hedges — pretend to believe that their gardeners' children
will be graduating from Harvard and curing cancer someday, but (1)
they don't believe that; and (2) if it happened, they'd lose their
gardeners.
Not to worry, Marie Antoinettes! According to "Alien
Nation"
author Peter Brimelow, "There is recent evidence that, even after
four generations, fewer than 10 percent of Mexicans have post-high
school degrees, as opposed to nearly half of
non-Mexican-Americans." So you'll always have the maid. As New
York mayor Michael Bloomberg said, our golf fairways would suffer
without illegal immigrants: "You and I both play golf; who takes
care of the greens and the fairways on your golf course?"
We fought a civil war to force Democrats to give up on slavery 150
years ago. They've become so desperate for servants that now they're
importing an underclass to wash their clothes and pick their
vegetables. This vast class of unskilled immigrants is the left's new
form of slavery.
What do they care if their servants are made citizens eligible to vote
and collect government benefits? Aren't the fabulously rich happy in
Venezuela? Oops, wrong example. Brazil? No, no, let me try again.
Mexico! ... Well, no matter. What could go wrong?
This was written to the head of the NAACP in Atlanta
about the Michael Vick affair.
Saturday, August 18, 2007 an Open Letter to the Atlanta Chapter of the NAACP
Dear Dr. R L White, Head of the Atlanta Chapter of the NAACP,
My name is Mike. I am 27, and I am neither a member of your organization nor a resident of Atlanta. Normally I wouldn't bother you, but then I came across this article, and it compelled me to write.
Since I am white, I am going to tread carefully, so as not to offend your gentle sensibilities. But, Dr. White, you are a dumb f_ck.
Speaking for white people everywhere, let me fill you in on something.
This case was not a race issue. It was about killing dogs. And if there is one thing people don't stand for, regardless of race, its killing dogs. You compared it to deer hunting. Again, Dr. White, you are a dumb f_ck.
When was the last time a deer greeted you at the door when you got home from work? Or curled up next to you and gently nuzzled in to take a nap? Dogs are pets, you moron. They aren't meant to be killed for sport. The failure to make this distinction only makes you look more stupid.
Sorry, I lost my temper there.
Here's the thing, Dr. White. The reason people were outraged by this was because he killed dogs. If Ben Roethlisberger or Brett Favre had done it, the reaction would have been the same, I guarantee you. The difference is, had Ben Roethlisberger or Brett Favre done this, you would not see white supporters rallying behind him, proclaiming he was innocent in face of mountains of damning evidence, supporting him regardless of the outcome.
Let me let you in on a secret about white people: when one of our own makes us look bad, we condemn him and disown him. I suggest you adopt a similar policy. If your group's mission is truly to advance "colored" people (your word, not mine) you'd disassociate from the idiots in your race. It can't go wrong, trust me.
Anyway, Dr. White, I don't want this to come off as racist, because it isn't. Michael Vick is a despicable person who happens to be black. The sooner you realize that, the less of a dumb f_ck you'll look like.
Sincerely, Mike
The APFTE thanks you
Mike for your effort to educate the NAACP about common sense and double
standards.
To Be or Not to Be “American”
When one can walk down the streets of any major US city and see illegal invaders marching under a Mexican flag with signs written in Spanish that attack, insult and incite sovereign American citizens who simply want secure organized legal immigration for their country, people with no right to be here at all demanding their alleged “American” right not only to remain here, but to redesign America too, one must ask what kind of American they intend to be?
But the problem doesn’t begin here. This is just a visible symptom of a much bigger problem in 21st Century America.
When Muslims are allowed to march down Broadway in the heart of New York City in celebration of 9/11, honoring the terrorists who carried out the most brutal attacks on innocent civilians anywhere in the world, we must ask what kind of Americans these people are? We have a right and a responsibility to ask…
But even this is not the root of the problem. It’s just another example of just how serious the problem has become in our country.
It seems that while many in the world desire a financially beneficial American residence, not nearly as many desire the responsibilities inherent with those benefits. But the problem does not begin with immigrants really, it begins right here at home.
To be American is not just to live in America, or even to just be born in America. Like all nations, America has given birth to many un-American or anti-American citizens, some of whom have been tried, convicted, jailed or put to death for acts against American interests. Not every individual born or residing in America is an American and that is where the problem begins.
To Be American... To avoid being accused of single handedly defining what it is to be “American,” I won’t define the term at all. Instead, I’ll simply rely upon our founding documents to define what it is to be “American.” If you don’t like the definition found in our founding documents, take it up with our founders who are responsible for defining America and what it means to be “American”.
Americans believe in a Creator, our Declaration of Independence says so.
Americans believe in certain unalienable rights and atop that list is Life, Liberty and the Freedom to pursue individual Happiness, also found in our nations Declaration as a free sovereign nation.
Americans believe that our rights are not afforded by elected Representatives, but rather endowed by our Creator.
Americans believe that all men are indeed Created equal, with the freedom to use their individual talents to become unequal by way of personal achievement, in pursuit of individual happiness.
Americans believe in a Representative Republic form of self-governance, strictly defined in and limited by our written, not imaginary, Constitution.
Americans believe in the individual right to earn and own, not take, redistribute and waste.
Americans believe in being generous with their own resources, not other people’s resources.
Americans believe in the right to bear arms, to speak freely no matter how offensive that speech might be to some, to clean up their government when it strays off course and to hold people accountable for their actions, both private and public.
Americans believe in free enterprise, capitalism, individual economic freedom to earn as much or as little as individually chosen, to be rich or poor, or anything they desire through honest efforts.
Americans believe in themselves, not government.
Americans believe that a nation of personal achievement leads to real progress and that penalizing personal achievement through progressive taxation of the productive in the name of a greater common good, leads to eventual collapse of the most progressive society on earth.
Americans believe in national sovereignty, which requires national security, including at our borders.
Americans believe in the spread of freedom and liberty around the globe as a means of reducing threats against our own freedom and liberty at home.
Americans believe in the rule of “American” laws, passed by the “American” legislative branch elected of, by and for the people of America, not international laws passed and administered by anti-American regimes around the world.
Americans believe that all of these principles serve the greatest common good of all Americans and that protecting and preserving America means protecting and preserving these principles.
Therefore, to be American is to believe in, to protect and defend these principles which made America the most prosperous, most generous and most powerful example of freedom on earth. To believe in these things, to work in support of these things, to put these ideas before self, is to be American.
Not to be American... Though offensive to many modern Americans who have bought into the Karl Marx concepts of progress, not to be American is just as easy to define. In short, to act against fundamental American principles is to act against America. One can not act against America and still be an American. It’s just that simple…
Though many seek to negotiate the definition of American, to make excuses for their anti-American ideas and actions, to cover their anti-American agendas in patriotic sounding buzz words like “progressive,” “socially conscious,” “liberal” or “tolerance,” the foundations of their movement remains wholly un-American, fully at odds with fundamental American principles and therefore, completely in opposition to America. That’s not “American”.
To Be or Not to Be... To be American is to believe in, practice, support, protect and defend American principles. There is no other way to be “American”. This means that to oppose these principles, in whole or in part, is to be something less than an American, something which is in fact, a threat to America.
Whether born in America or immigrating to America, each individual must choose to support or oppose American principles. If the principles of your heritage, your homeland, are more important than American principles, then stay in your homeland where those principles are welcome. America has it’s own principles and values and you will be expected to adopt them, one and all, upon asking to become an “American”.
Contrary to modern popular excuses, there is no middle ground! Being anti-capitalism is the same as being pro-socialism, as these are the opposing economic ideas.
Being pro-abortion is the same as being anti-innocent life.
Being pro-government is the same as being anti-individual liberty and freedom.
America was formed and built upon certain specific principles and values and those ideas have served America better than any set of ideas have ever served any people in recorded history. Left intact, they will serve America and the world for as long as Americans remember, respect and protect those principles.
However, the erosion of those principles and values means the erosion of America and a free sovereign nation of independent individuals able to pursue happiness free from government intrusions or legislated limitations. America is falling because the principles and values are falling. Those who seek a middle ground between right and wrong, good and evil, American and anti-American, are just as responsible for the fall of America as those who openly work in direct opposition to America. They just lack the intestinal fortitude to admit what they are…un-American.
Only those who support American principles and values are truly American!
Attacking America in word or deed is not American.
Attacking life, liberty, freedom, individual achievement, national sovereignty and security, unfettered peaceful religious expression, 2nd Amendment rights, private property rights, public decency, personal privacy or any other fundamental American ideals is NOT American.
If you do this after being elected to represent “Americans,” then you are in fact a “traitor”.
If you do these things, no matter what name you try to give them, you are NOT an American.
It’s time for real Americans to stand and be counted. It’s time to put a stop to any and all who seek to erode America by eroding American principles and it’s high time we stop apologizing for protecting and preserving the greatest nation ever known to mankind.
It’s time to choose, to be or not to be, American!
The Truth of Interracial Rape in the United States
Like Ahab's search for the Great White Whale, liberals' search for the Great White Defendant is relentless and never-ending.
When, in 1988, Tawana Brawley's and Al Sharpton's then year-old spectacular charge that several white men including prosecutor Steven Pagones (whose name Brawley had picked out of a newspaper article) had abducted and raped the 15 year old was shown to be completely false, the Nation said it didn't matter, since the charges expressed the essential nature of white men's treatment of black women in this country.
When the Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper last year, liberals everywhere treated the accusation as fact, because, just as with the Nation and Tawana Brawley, the rape charge seemed to the minds of liberals to reflect the true nature of oppressive racial and sexual relations in America.
To see the real truth of the matter, let us take a look at the Department of Justice document Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2005. (Go to the linked document, and under "Victims and Offenders" download the
file for 2005.)
In Table 42, entitled "Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender," we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005. (The number of rapes is not distinguished from those of sexual assaults; it is maddening that sexual assault, an ill-defined category that covers various types of criminal acts ranging from penetration to inappropriate touching, is conflated with the more specific crime of rape.)
In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5 percent of the offenders were white, and 33.6 percent of the offenders were black.
In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white. The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.
The table does not give statistics for Hispanic victims and offenders. But the bottom line on interracial white/black and black/white rape is clear:
"In the United States in 2005, 37,460 white females were sexually assaulted or raped by a black man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.
What this means is that every day in the United States, over one hundred white women are raped or sexually assaulted by a black
man."
The Department of Justice statistics refer, of course, to verified reports. According to the Wikipedia article on rape, as many as half of all rape charges nationally are determined by police and prosecutors to be false:
Linda Fairstein, former head of the New York County District Attorney's Sex Crimes Unit, noted, "There are about 4,000 reports of rape each year in Manhattan. Of these, about half simply did not happen.... It's my job to bring justice to the man who has been falsely accused by a woman who has a grudge against him, just as it's my job to prosecute the real thing."
No wonder there was such absolute belief in the guilt of the Duke students among the leading sectors of liberal America.
A drug-addled, half-deranged, promiscuous black stripper accused three young white men of raping her.
There are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the United States, and half of all rape charges against specific individuals turn out to be false. But in the
agnostic, inverted world of liberal demonology, the white students had to be guilty.
Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, "a white woman was raped by black man."
Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women's apartments on Manhattan's Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media's reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case. Each story of black on white rape is reported in isolation, not presented as part of a larger pattern. There is never the slightest mention of the fact that white women in this country are being targeted by black rapists.
In the inverted world of liberalism, the phenomenon does not exist.
By Lawrence Auster
May 3, 2007
Lawrence Auster is the author of Erasing America: The Politics of the Borderless Nation. He offers a traditionalist conservative perspective at View from the Right.
Article Link
We Live In The
Land Of The Free, Because of The Patriotic Brave... Please
Support Our Troops In Their Effort To Keep Terrorism And
Those That Would Promote It Busy Somewhere Else... Instead
Of Having More Acts Of Terrorism In Our Own Cities, Murdering
Thousands Of Our Citizens In The Name Of The Terrorists Fanatically
Warped Religious Beliefs.