APFTE Five Minutes Of Reality... Articles & Letters from APFTE Supporters

 Rick Smith APFTE Founder

Email APFTE

   Bruce Woodhull Staff Writer

Sean M. Sullivan Staff Writer

Our Korean Problem is

"Made In China" Too!

  North Korea would have to do more than fire a missile for a retaliatory response from us. I doubt any action besides sanctions of some type would be taken unless there was actual destruction done due to a NK missile landing somewhere.  One could probably land smack in the middle of San Francisco in front of the Mayors Office and as long as it didn't explode the Weirdo Liberal Anti-Americans living there would most likely oppose us retaliating.  

"Well gee whiz, it didn't explode, so what's the big deal?  Lets have a protest march instead, it's our Countries fault for not giving North Korea more of what they wanted in the first place..."   (Does anybody really think that if we helped NK they would actually not turn around and stab us in the back like France and many other Countries have done that we helped?)

Our Country feeds it's enemies, helps countries like China economically and moves industries to India and other second and third world countries until they end up getting so competitive that now they're competing for the worlds oil supplies... and we wonder how we got into the spot we're in with high gas prices! 

Keep buying Chinese and other foreign made products from countries that really hate us people, and someday if you’re unlucky enough our country won't be manufacturing a damn thing anymore.  From pots and pans, plastic products, food, clothes, chemicals, pet food, toothpaste, auto parts, shop equipment and whatever else you can think of, it gets "Made in China" shipped here and bought by total Morons that wouldn't notice they're the real  problem if it bit them right in their ass!
Do you always buy the cheapest products you can find? Are you a big fan of Wal-Mart? Well thank you for helping China inevitably screw us at the gas pumps you dumb shit!
     Don't feed the enemy...

Then we continue to play “Mother Hen" over South Korea and 50 years after the war ended there they still can't defend themselves from their Northern neighbors that China is Allied with. South Korea's resources instead, go into building new industries so they can manufacture and ship their products here where lame-brained people continue to buy it. Self-defense is secondary in SK because the US stupidly continues to play Mother Hen.
Although, if you must buy foreign goods, at least buy products from countries that are Allies and don't buy anything from countries where the profits will be used to make them more powerful than us. You just might be able to continue to live the standard of living you and your family have grown accustomed to.

Japan can’t protect itself either if China or even NK’s attitude changed. We're over there installing defenses because Japan, the country that brought us "Pearl Harbor" actually owns a great portion of America now and won't build it's defenses to protect itself by their own choice.  Un-like China, Japan not only wants to take our jobs and make us slaves to their manufacturing empire, but they want our Military to protect them too.  

What the hell is wrong with our Leaders in the last 40 to 50 years anyway for allowing this to happen?  

Is it that some people have to be kicked in the ass over and over again before they finally learn a lesson?

Why bother building your Military when you can take advantage of the USA, sell them your stuff and still have them protect you even while the US economy changes from a manufacturing climate to a service oriented climate.  

Either enter the service industry or be a slave to their manufacturing industry base they have built on our soil. 

Wake up Americans!

It's past the time we realized that there is no such thing as Patriotism when it comes to what once were known as "American Corporations" but are now calling themselves "International Corporations".  These companies would sell our country down the river to make an buck by helping to export our manufacturing jobs to cheap foreign labor.

The moral and final lesson of this story has yet to come, and we can still do something about it Friends, but the sun is setting on American manufacturing now.  You can still buy the American made products that are still being produced here even if they cost a little more.  Keep in mind that every dollar saved buying a foreign made product sells our future, your future, your kids future, your neighbors future... your Country's future down the road of no return that much quicker.  

Remember you read that, so you can think about the choices you made later if things get so bad you begin to wonder how it all came about.

Manufacturing has steadily moved out of the USA for years now, try finding a USA made TV set, radio, fax machine, computer, the list goes on and on.  Hell, even Levi Jeans has had problems because of the cheap foreign cloths that are flooding the market.  Did you ever think that the company that invented "Jeans" would actually be beat down by cheap foreign "Jean" copies?

If we don’t watch out, someday China may stop selling us the Military Uniforms it makes for us and we may have to actually start a textile industry here again to get more… That is unless we buy them from India, Mexico or somewhere else where our textile industry moved to.  

Wal-Mart became the biggest store in America by helping to undermine our manufacturing industries by predominately selling cheap foreign junk to stupid narrow-minded Americans.  Then paying some of the lowest wages in the USA to it's workers while raking in billions of dollars in profit so they could buy more cheap Chinese crap to have low-paid American workers load on Wal-mart shelves so other even dumber Americans could put it in their shopping carts... 

Then they go home and wonder just where the good paying American manufacturing jobs are going to.

It's a circle jerk of stupidity and greed.

More people own American Flags "Made in China" than made in the USA these days!  

At least make sure the American Flag your buying and flying was made in the Good Old USA!

The whole thing makes me sick…

 Help our enemies get strong enough to really take us on? 

That’s the American way?

How Damned Stupid!  

And it's long past the time it should have stopped!

By Rick Smith APFTE

And then there were none: 

A free market assessment on the race for the presidency...

    The withdrawal of Fred Thompson from the presidential primary will have far more of an impact to the Republican primary than to dampen the spirits of Thompson supporters. To say it plainly, the exit of Thompson marks the end of the potential of a conservative entering the White House in 2008. A person might believe that I will be starting a long-winded defense of Thompson but that is not the case. My goal today is to bring readers to a sense of the cold realities of the political state of affairs from the perspective of a cold handed dealer; that is, the free market. If we look at the presidential primary we can see that Thompson, as well as the other true conservative in the race, Duncan Hunter sowed the seeds of their own defeat. I say this in truth as well as in sadness as I was a strong Thompson supporter and I believe that he would have made a very able president. However, if we fail to face the truth we’re doomed to a repetition of this kind in the future.

            I continue to believe that the majority of this nation embodies mainstream conservative values. We see this time and time again when social and fiscal issues are allowed to be voted upon by the citizenry. So, if this is true, why are the candidates that remain in competition for the Republican Party that have any chance of winning moderates at best and moreover liberals in reality? Why did true conservatives like Thompson and Hunter fall by the wayside? The answer is that both candidates in different ways failed to address free market requirements for success and they suffered the consequences. It breaks down pretty simply. People are consumers and when it’s time to select a Presidential candidate they buy with their voting dollar. They invest in a Presidential candidate that markets his or her wares to the public the most effectively within the laws of supply and demand. Yes, we listen to the debates, read the flyers, we think, we ponder, and pretty much kick the tires on each candidate until we come to the critical decision on who we want to invest in.

            If you can place your mind in the free market mentality of supply and demand it is easy to see that it is absolutely necessary that any product, no matter its superiority, must be marketed properly. Thompson, while I believe he had the superior product for the current market failed to advertise himself in a way to maximize his strengths. First, he got in late in the race and missed the window of opportunity to maximize his marketability. By the time he came into the race many potential Thompson supporters, anxious to invest promotional labor behind a candidate, opted for lesser candidates that actively wanted the position. Compounding Thompson’s woes was his perceived sluggishness and lack of tenacious vigor after announcing his candidacy. Later in the race Thompson would begin to assert his oratory skills and lay out his superior conservative record but by that time, people for the most part had invested in their candidates. Again, we see this in the free market. Even the best products that are marketed poorly collect cobwebs on the shelf until the business eventually closes its doors. Duncan Hunter’s inability to promote his conservative strengths, namely his ability to get progress made on the border fence, helped to bring about his political demise.

            All this may sound harsh but it is both the cold truth and the beauty of the free market. I am a champion of the capitalistic free market system and I defend it at length from liberal socialists who would like to dismantle the market’s cold hand of supply and demand and replace it with warm uniformly of government distributed misery. I find myself constantly reiterating that the free market never promises success for anyone, simply a fighting chance for everyone. Hard work, innovation, marketing, and a viable product will always be the components of success. Within these requirements, Thompson and Hunter failed to sell their product to the American people properly. I think that is a shame as I believe the country will need what they had to offer down the road. What now? Republicans find themselves now attempting to compete with liberal Democrats in the market place of ideas without a product that differentiates itself. Plainly put, voters no longer have a liberal and conservative product to choose from. The free market no longer will be based on supply and demand but on the precarious tenets of the selection of lesser evils. This is a losing proposition for Republicans who would have the audacity to believe that consumers would have an interest to invest in social liberalism within the Republican Party when they have tried and true products in the Democrat Party already time tested and on the shelf. The market cannot be blamed, the blame falls on candidates who have marketed themselves poorly and the candidates who remain that fail to contrast themselves with the competition. The final question will be answered down the road and that is whether consumers of the conservative ideology will change their buying habits or just stay home?   

By Paul A. Ibbetson

(Paul A. Ibbetson is a published author and lecturer on the Patriot Act. He is a former Chief of Police of Cherryvale, Kansas, and member of the Montgomery County Drug Task Force. Paul received his Bachelor’s and Master’s degree in Criminal Justice at Wichita State University, and is currently completing his PhD. in sociology at Kansas State University. Paul is the author of the book “Living Under The Patriot Act: Educating A Society” that is available for purchase at www.patriotactresearch.com and www.ibbetsonusa.com as well as other major book outlets. Paul is a regular writer for the Conservative Crusader as well as 35 other online websites.)               

Ok... Bush Does Suck...

When George W. Bush was first elected US President, this website held high expectations of the new President and gave him the benefit of the doubt... clearly, our expectations have been shattered.

It is now without a doubt, not un-reasonable to declare that 

"The Bush Presidency SUCKS!"

His absolute mishandling of the illegal immigrant invasion as well as the general protection of our borders, resulting in the deterioration of the level of safety for American Citizens and his general apathy to the wants and demands of concerned Americans would lead any fair-minded American to cast a no confidence vote on his performance up to now.  

Who would have thought he could go against the will of the American People even more than he already has! 

Unbelievably, he has done it... now "El Presidente Bush" is allowing Mexican owned trucking company trucks to have total un-monitored access to our nations highways!   

As one news source properly puts it... 

"Are the drivers properly licensed and sober or well-rested with the legal amount of down time? Do they speak English or understand U.S. road signs? Will the trucks be carrying illegal immigrants, drugs, terrorists, nuclear or biological weapons or other contraband? Will they belch tons of banned pollutants into America’s air? Will lower-paid Mexican drivers put American truckers out of work? Will the trucks gut the tax base which supports the U.S. highway infrastructure?" Newsmax

Well the APFTE gives up on this self-centered President for good.

QUITE AN ANALOGY... 
I bought a bird feeder. I hung it on my back porch and filled it with seed. Within a week we had hundreds of birds taking advantage of the continuous flow of free and easily accessible food. But then the birds started building nests in the boards of the patio, above the table, and next to the barbecue. Then came the poop. It was everywhere: on the patio tile, the chairs, the table ... everywhere. 

Then some of the birds turned mean: They would dive bomb me and try to peck me even though I had fed them out of my own pocket. And others birds were boisterous and loud: They sat on the feeder and squawked and screamed at all hours of the day and night and demanded that I fill it when it got low on food. 

After a while, I couldn't even sit on my own back porch anymore. I took down the bird feeder and in three days the birds were gone. I cleaned up their mess and took down the many nests they had built all over the patio. 

Soon, the back yard was like it used to be ...... quiet, serene and no one demanding their rights to a free meal. 

Now lets see ....... our government gives out free food, subsidized housing, free medical care, free education and allows anyone born here to be an automatic citizen. Then the illegal's came by the tens of thousands. 

Suddenly our taxes went up to pay for free services; small apartments are housing 5 families: you have to wait 6 hours to be seen by an emergency room doctor: your child's 2nd grade class is behind other schools because over half the class doesn't speak English: Corn Flakes now come in a bilingual box; I have to press "one" to hear my bank talk to me in English, and people waving flags other than "Old Glory" are squawking and screaming in the streets, demanding more rights and free liberties. 

Maybe it's time for the government to take down the bird feeder. 

If you agree, pass this on.........

  Emailed to us by Sean Sullivan

---

Top Ten Questions for Democrat Presidential Candidates

10) If we can’t drill, can’t refine, can’t mine, can’t build nuclear power plants and can’t burn fossil fuels, how can we become “energy independent”? I mean besides returning America to the Stone Age.

9) If we start burning our food to avoid upsetting a few caribou, what will we eat next and how much will it cost compared to a gallon of ethanol?

8) Since our federal government has never failed to increase their original projected budget, or outspend that budget no matter how many times its been increased, why should we believe that you are going to lower the cost of health care if we let you manage that?

7) Aren’t you the folks who came up with the HMO?

6) If Cheryl Crow believes in one square of tissue per wipe, does she believe in one mini-pad per period and isn’t she on your team?

5) If America has already lost in Iraq, who won and when will we face the victor again?

4) If the people are so stupid that they need you to take care of their most fundamental needs, how do you feel about being elected by the dumbest people in America?

3) If illegal immigration was the key to America’s multi-cultural success, was legal immigration a blot on that record?

2) If Hillary Clinton can’t make her husband behave like a decent human being, why should we believe that she has the backbone to make Iran, North Korea, Syria, China or Russia behave?

1) Can anyone run for president now, or does affirmative action limit it to just empty suits from Illinois with no resume’ who have a Muslim sounding name?

Posed by JB Williams©2007 USA

By JB Williams LINK

Guest opinion by John W. Lillpop

Dear Dubya: America Don't Need No Stinkin' Reform! 

A comment concerning the State of the Union address delivered by President Bush on January 23, 2007: 

With all due respect to the President and his Mexican handlers and underwriters, America does NOT need immigration reform, comprehensive or otherwise. 

What this nation desperately needs is a President and Congress that will apply due diligence on behalf of America, rather than working for huge U.S. corporate interests, illegal aliens, and the Mexican government. 

In one of the most extraordinary statements ever uttered by a President in a State of the Union address, Bush said, in part, "We cannot fully secure the border unless we take pressure off the border." 

Too much "pressure" at the border, sir? 

Good grief, there are upwards of 30 million illegal aliens squatting in America right now--what "pressure" is the man talking about? 

Apparently, America could be "blessed" with another 100 million illegal aliens or so, were it not for all that "pressure" at the borders. And, from Bush's perspective, that would be a good thing? 

The truth is that Bush can solve the immigration nightmare overnight by simply living up to his constitutional responsibility to defend America "against all enemies, foreign and domestic." 

Or to put it more succinctly, Mr. President, secure our borders and enforce existing immigration laws. Period! 

Forget about "comprehensive" reform, which is nothing more than code-speak for amnesty. 

The President is reportedly a student of history. Perhaps he would benefit by boning up on recent immigration history. 

Namely: 
In 1986, the United States adopted the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) (Simpson-Mazzoli Act, IRCA, and Pub. L. 99-603, Nov. 6, 1986, 100 Stat. 3359). Go here: LINK 
IRCA was enacted to reduce illegal immigration, which was a problem for the American economy. Three million illegal aliens were granted amnesty as a result of IRCA. 

IRCA would have worked, and would still work--if enforced! 

Unfortunately, both Democrat and Republican administrations have failed (refused?) to enforce the IRCA. As a result, twenty years later, America is saddled with an additional 30 million illegal aliens. 

Most distressing is the fact that the "surge" from south of the border continues unabated, in spite of 9/11 and the threat posed by terrorists. 

Apparently the president would have the American people believe that securing the borders 8,000 miles from home is vital to U.S. homeland security, but that securing our own borders is not vital. 

And how can that be, Mr. President? 

Is it because, in your mind, illegal aliens are "good hearted, hard working folks" simply looking for a better life? 

And does that description also apply to the scores of millions of third-world peasants still in Mexico and other Latin American nations and thinking of invading America? 

All are good hearted and hard working? Without a single Jihadist, or potential terrorist, in their midst? 

Again, with all due respect to the President, America's experience with the 1986-amnesty fiasco proves that we need secured borders and rigid enforcement of our laws. 

The last thing we need is less "pressure" on the border and a hair-brained amnesty scheme. 

Or, to put the issue in terms even most illegal aliens could understand: 

America don't need no stinkin' immigration reform! 

By John W. Lillpop, San Jose CA.

Colorado News

This text is from a county emergency manager out in the western part of Denver after the recent snowstorm.

WEATHER BULLETIN:  Up here, we just recovered from a Historic event--- may I even say a "Weather Event" of "Biblical Proportions" --- with a historic blizzard of up to 44" inches of snow and winds to 90 MPH that broke trees in half, knocked down utility poles, stranded hundreds of motorists in lethal snow banks, closed ALL roads, isolated scores of communities and cut power to tens of thousands.

FYI:

George Bush did not come.

FEMA did nothing.

No one howled for the government.

No one blamed the government.

No one even uttered an expletive on TV .

Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton did not visit.

Our Mayor did not blame Bush or anyone else.

Our Governor did not blame Bush or anyone else, either.

ABC, CBS or NBC did not report on this snowstorm.  Nobody demanded $2,000 debit cards.

No one asked for a FEMA Trailer House.

No one looted.

Nobody - I mean Nobody demanded the government do something.

Nobody expected the government to do anything, either.

No Larry King, No Bill O'Rielly, No Oprah, No Chris Mathews and No Geraldo Rivera.

No Sean Penn, No Barbara Striesand, No Hollywood types to be found.

Nope, we just melted the snow for water.

Sent out caravans of SUV's to pluck people out of snow engulfed cars.

The truck drivers pulled people out of snow banks and didn't ask for a penny.

Local restaurants made food and the police and fire departments delivered it to the snowbound families.

Families took in the stranded people - total strangers.

We fired up wood stoves, broke out coal oil lantern s or Coleman lanterns.

We put on extra layers of clothes because up here it is "Work or Die".

We did not wait for some affirmative action government to get us out of a mess created by being immobilized by a welfare program that trades votes for 'sitting at home' checks.

Even though a Category "5" blizzard of this scale has never fallen this early, we know it can happen and how to deal with it ourselves.

"In my many travels, I have noticed that once one  gets north of about 48 degrees North Latitude, 90% of the world's social problems evaporate."

It does seem that way, at least to me.

I hope this gets passed on.

Maybe SOME people will get the message that American Taxpayers Do Not owe you a living.  

APFTE NOTE: Over a week after the initial event the area was finally officially deemed a "Disaster Area".  But you didn't hear one single cry of "Racism" or "Discrimination" did you?  We know why... do you?  

It's a matter of background and upbringing.

"He is an anti-Semitic son of a bitch. He should (expletive) die!”  

    Loudmouth Joan Rivers says Mel Gibson deserves death for the anti-Semitic remarks he made during his drunk driving arrest. Considering all the nasty things Joan has said about people during her entire career it's amazing none of her targets have demanded her death for it yet. If Mel would have said something bad about Catholics, or Lutherans she may have probably enjoyed it or used it in her vindictive act.

  She doesn't even have to be drunk to say evil things about others and managed to build her whole career on doing it.  Joan is a hypocrite of the first degree and happens to be just too ignorant or crass to realize it.  Mel was drunk, and made a huge mistake, but Joan has made a living out of saying hateful things about other people.  

  Who is really the worse kind of person... Mel or Joan?  We pick Joan.  If Joan Rivers began apologizing this very day, it would take the rest of her miserable life to make up for all the nasty, vindictive comments she has aimed towards others in the past.  

R. Smith APFTE 10-15-06

Mel Gibson: "Fu**ing Jews... The Jews are responsible for all the wars in the world."

   I've wondered about Mel Gibson's grip on reality in the past... fanatics seem to turn up in all types and styles don't they?

   I think it's that some people still hate him because of the movie he made about Christ that brings everything he mentions into the headlines.  Anything he says will be paid great attention to, and him being drunk enough to make an outright anti-Semitic remark will be brought right into the limelight in a "New York Minute", and that my Friends is pretty fast!   Mel seems to be a very enthusiastic person and people like that are prone to occasionally make a mistake.

   It not only was a stupid thing to do on his part but inaccurate as well.  Jewish People haven't caused all the wars in the world, but anybody with a brain will have to admit that religion in general, has caused many of the wars in the world. 

Imagine there's no heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today...

   John Lennon may have had optimistic thoughts there, however, all he did was ask people to imagine what it would be like without religion and heaven and he was dragged across the coals for it.  One thing is guaranteed, if you disagree with some people about religion, you're asking for admonishment for sure.  

   Religion is the single most sensitive issue with the least possible proof that it even has any factual foundation in reality, that can cause one person to want to actually kill another one...  Some of them in the name of their God too!  

   Just what kind of religions "Supreme Entity" would impose death upon people that just didn't submit to it?  It's easy to believe the Devil would exact or condone such a toll, but a purportedly benevolent God?  

   Kind of makes you reconsider just what some people are actually worshiping doesn't it?

   Without religion, that hellhole in the middle east would just be another piece of real estate.  But the fact that several religions are based on assorted translations of what supposedly happened in the area thousands of years ago, fanatics from all sides are willing to kill and die for it.  How downright wacky can it get!  

Then again religion brings out the madness in some people... and many of them don't even have to be drunk! 

   What a shame and how ironic that "Religion," something that is suppose to bring you closer to the "All Mighty" has been the catalyst for so much suffering for mankind in that area and around the rest of the globe.  And what's more, this is only the tip of the iceberg, because the most fanatically intolerant religion of them all, Islam, is going to give the worlds population that doesn't want to follow it a problem for the next 50 years or so yet before either they are quelled or calmed down in some dramatic way.  I'll leave the dramatic way to your imagination...

    History has shown that since the "birth" of modern day religions, every 400 to 600 years a Crusades has been launched to stem the spread of one fanatical religion that causes so much death and pain to anyone that doesn't submit to it's follower's wishes.  There is a History of problems stemming from that single religion that seems to be an adversary to free thinking people.

 The last time, King Richard the Lion Heart and other Christian Kings managed to deal with the problem using only Swords, Shields, Bows and Siege Equipment and it took many, many years.  Now Fanatical Islam has grown stronger once more while the rest of humanity has ignored the inevitable, and now that same enemy of peace has raised it's ugly intolerant head once again.  Quite possibly proving that until one side totally eliminates the other, the world will be subjected to this sickening reenactment of fanatical events for the next 1000 years and beyond.  When it comes to Islamic Fanatics endangering innocent people, history has chosen to repeat itself again and again.  

   The most ominous thing about it now is, we've become technologically developed to the point we can obliterate almost every Man, Woman, Child and animal on our planet, but not emotionally developed enough to overcome or control our idealistic emotional religious beliefs... 

   This imminent Crusade may just let the "Nuclear Genie" out of the bottle... because these nuts believe it's good to die in the name of their cause and if that is indeed the case, then ironically, the next Crusades about 600 or so years from now, will most likely be fought with Swords, Shields, Bows and Siege Equipment again... 

   Allowing Atomic bombs to get into the hands of Islamic Fanatics is just like handing a Chimpanzee a loaded machinegun!

   Mel Gibson has apologized publicly for the remark and seems sincere about it, lets see if the Leaders of the A. D. L. are big enough to accept his apology, because we have bigger problems right around the corner.

By R. Smith 7-30-06

Discussion & Comments Link

THE DEM’S ARE CAUGHT IN A QUAGMIRE

   Newt Gingrich tells us we are fighting World War III. This is bad news for the Democrats. The owners of the word ‘quagmire’ are themselves in a quagmire they can’t let the world in on. Should the news conscious population of the United States start conceiving of the War on Terror as World War III, the war suddenly takes on a new definition. That ‘new’ definition translates into the United States and it’s allies fighting for the very survival of Western Culture on the planet.

This translates to disaster for the Dem’s. Their claim of secular isolation of certain Arab countries for Bush’s gratuitous persecution of family vendettas suddenly ceases to exist. Now the Dem’s will have to anticipate another resurgence of American nationalism and patriotism. The quagmire for the Dem’s is their platform of anything having to do with the War on Terror is fair game for one purpose: attacking the war for Democratic political expediency. Should the War on Terror morph to World War III, the Dem’s are caught in a quagmire of protesting World War III while attempting to be pro-American/pro-American troops!

Since the Democrats have offered nothing of substance to the American voting constituency, they will be forced to make a painful decision.
Do they get on board with the war to save Western Culture or do they continue to sell out the future of America for present-day political gains?

Before the 2008 election more allies in the global conflicts with Islam will cement the reality that we are fighting World War III. When the Dem’s continue to try to isolate the ‘conflicts’ with innocent, sovereign Islamic nations as a Bush/Israeli conspiracy to destroy the Middle East. The Dem’s cannot exist without some sort of gratuitous rant of doom and gloom to include everything from icebergs breaking away from the ice pack and clogging New York Harbor to exploiting the dead/suddenly undead videos of Palestinians zombies orchestrating phony war footage.

This is the time of World War III. This war will be a prolonged and sporadic as the battlefields will explode on the globe one isolated terrorist attack after another. Until the world community adopts the Israeli strategy of dealing with terrorism; the terrorist have free reign over the globe. The terrorists are free to pick and choose their time and place to explode next. This is not a nation to nation or military vs. military kind of war like World War II. The tactics and players are different and change daily to stay in the fight.
Unfortunately for the Democrats, they are stuck in a quagmire created from their own self-defeating agenda of nothingness for the sake of political self-worth. It’s time for the Democrats to find a new word to replace quagmire.

By Bruce Woodhull 8/7/06

---

 Bruce Woodhull Article 7/14/06

Recently I was asked why many pro-illegal supporters marched under the banner of indigenous peoples rights. The tactic of claiming indigenous rights based on race and geographic distribution of indigenous peoples prior to European populations occupying North America is meant to subvert the US Constitution with an existing order of native law and claims to specific territory. Historically, a universally accepted form of law and tribal restraint did not exist on the level today's 'indigenous' peoples claim existed. Nor did specific boundaries and nation states exist as used for exploitation purposes of so-called 'indigenous' peoples.  This tactic has been devised by the American left (probably white academics with some knowledge of domestic sovereignty treaty) as an attempt to give anyone who claims indigenous ancestry legitimate claim and right to live within the established boundaries of the United States. 

The duplicitous standard that immediately jumps out at Americans is the fact that no indigenous claim to US territory can be established without an in-depth study of tribal history and an act of Congress under the very Constitutional law indigenous activists are attempting to trump! Those individuals who attempt to force this fraud on the citizens of the United States also rely on the very US Constitution to grant them citizen rights once they claim to be a domestic sovereign citizen. The definition of domestic sovereignty in the US has been applied numerous times from the 1838 Doctrine of Domestic Sovereignty through numerous treaties the US entered into with Indian Nations in the past. This application still exists today as 'tribes' suddenly find their ancestry and historical geography for the purpose of applying for gaming licenses and building a casino. 

Those individuals who think their mob mentality and sheer numbers of illegal occupants of US cities and counties will afford them instant US citizenship will either be granted guest worker amnesty with an opportunity in the future to legally apply for US citizenship, or will continue to live in the US illegally. The claim of indigenous citizenship with in US boundaries is nothing more than a media ploy intended to attract support from the ignorant left and sympathizers and the hope that this claim will someday end up in a federal court, suing for US citizenship.
One of the unspoken agendas of the academics leading this 'cause' is the secret promise of once millions of 'indigenous' illegals establish domestic sovereignty they can establish tribal governments and populations, be recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, immediately be given housing, commodities, natural resource rights, education and medical care and the immediate application to build a casino! 

Not only do those marches with the Che Guevara t-shirts and 'We were here first' banners think they will continue to receive taxpayer funded federal and state welfare entitlements, but they also have an opportunity to be instant millionaires once their tribal casino is built! 

Ironic isn't it, that communist influenced academics in the US use the carrot on a stick dream of instant wealth to fuel their revolution by attracting un-educated and irresponsible anti-Americans to their socialist cause. I can hear them plying their lies in secret meetings in the barrio: " El Casino is only a Congressional hearing away!" It's happening out there! 

I'm sure Teddy Kennedy will be made an honorary tribal member. 

His Indian name will be Buffalo Wallow Ted.

By Bruce Woodhull 7/14/06

Note from Rick: A better name for Teddy would be "Buffalo Chip Ted"... 

 article Part 2

La Raza, Azteca and La MeCha are all satellite groups of extremist racist 
academics, who for years have tried to attract followers for their vision of 
a 'Bronze Nation'. I guess I would qualify for being a Bronze Nation 
citizen....or at least a guy with a good 'tan'. These groups have gained 
national media attention because the comlib media loves any anti-American 
show. These groups are primarily located on college campuses.
Their big failing is: THEY HAVE NO POWER once their illegal marching buddies 
either 1. get a job or 2. sign up for welfare.

La Raza and the rest cannot provide jobs, cannot provide food stamps, free 
medical care, free housing, legal protection, or futures for the children of 
illegals.

The media makes these groups appear like a national political party. They 
are not. They are small and only as active and vocal as their aging Hispanic 
academic leaders. In the late 70's the La Raza group at the University of 
Colorado had two....2.....members. One of those guys became a lawyer and a 
county judge. The other guy graduated from CU and got a job with IBM. They 
were both American citizens talking this anti-American bullshit. Funny how 
good jobs and security trumped La Raza.

The same thing happens in the ghetto and barrio. I don't know one 
Mexican-American, legal or illegal (the illegals in this town have kind of 
disappeared) that wants to be a Mechan or a Razan. These radical over blown, 
over covered groups are just too small and meaningless.

I know when we read their stuff we get excited but believe me....even in 
LA....they can't beat capitalism and Democracy. Watch them over the next few 
years. A guest worker amnesty program would take all the wind out of their 
sails.

Want to put a La Raza community leader out of business? Fire him or her from 
their cushy tenured university job.

That's right. We have created in the United States and environment 
controlled by communists which is perfect for these asshats to cultivate 
their trash. They are protected by law and the US Constitution...which they 
scream they have rights under while they actively promote the over throw of 
the American government.

Fire these guys from their tenured jobs in academia and they disappear into 
some obscure intellectual elephant graveyard.

What about Karl Rove addressing a La Raza function? Doesn’t that give La 
Raza some credibility?

Rove did address a La Raza group. La Raza is trying to become 'main stream' 
by enlisting Hispanics in government and business. Those Hispanic 
politicians who 'belong' to La Raza do so solely for the political 
expediency they think they obtain from Hispanic voting constituencies.
The problem is, to be effective within the 'system', both in politics and 
business, the radical rhetoric must go but the facade of activism is allowed 
to be maintained, as long as the name doesn't damage the bottom line. We 
live in a world of window dressing. Again, regardless how La Raza portrays 
itself.....it's still a meaningless symbol of Hispanic sovereignty as 
Hispanics become mainstream. In a sense, we the People of the United States 
allow thin skinned Hispanics to keep their dignity by letting them show up 
with a La Raza coffee cup.

By Bruce Woodhull 7/14/06

HATE TEMPERED BY REVENGE CAN SAVE A NATION

 Most Americans were outraged at the news of the cowardly slaughter by butchering and beheading of two American soldiers in Iraq.  American citizens have called for the military commanders in Iraq to ‘take the gloves off’ in Iraq rather than continue to fight a ‘sanitary’ war intended to reduce collateral damage in terms of civilian casualties.

 The opponents of the war are quick to call for immediate withdrawal of American troops from Iraq.  This ‘cut and run’ political rant is nothing more than exploitation of American deaths in Iraq for the purpose of liberal political expediency.  The calls for revenge and prompt action from angered and frustrated Americans is justified and to be expected.  Our military is fighting a smaller force that have no regard for their own lives or the lives of civilians or Coalition troops.  War science has shown that an insurgency cannot exist without the support and aid of indigenous populations.  Someone in Iraq is offering cover and support to the terrorists who butchered two American soldiers. 

The question is: who do we spare in the search to eradicate the cold-blooded killers comprising the insurgency.  My answer is: spare no one.  My belief is once the coalition troops hand over authority and prosecuting of the war to the Iraqi Army; a blood bath will ensue in Iraq.  The Iraq Army will purge the terrorists and segments of the Iraqi population who support the insurgency.  Europeans dealt harshly and openly with Nazi sympathizers during WWII.  In the United States just the opposite is true.  Anti-American organizations receive honored status on the pecking order of liberal pundits and academic hacks.  

The left portrays the anti-American/pro-terrorist political rant as always right and to be expected.  What the left cannot accept but is more than willing to exploit is the demand of the American public for the harsh and swift revenge killings of the sows that butchered two of our soldiers.  Indeed the anti-war American left and some media whores have been ‘praying’ for this to happen in Iraq.  To the left, this justifies their demands to pull out and illustrates the desperate extremes the Iraqi ‘freedom fighters’ are forced to indulge in to remove the American occupation forces from Iraq. 

We have experienced this sort of hate and demand for revenge before.  In the 18^th and 19^th centuries America forged westward into the expanses of territory occupied by Indian tribes.  The indigenous peoples fought the advances of civilization with stone-age warfare.  Americans were outrage when they learned pioneers and American soldiers were tortured and killed in the most horrific ways by the Indians.  Tales of mutilation of the dead bodies of white Americans only increased the American publics demand for harsh and swift eradication of the tribe’s occupying the American West. 

Indian warfare has been chronicled in American literature and movies.  In the movie version of James Fennimore Cooper’s ‘Last of the Mohicans’, Indian warfare was accurately portrayed.  Indians attacking the British savagely hacked and bludgeoned the Red Coats to pieces.  Scalps were taken in the blink of an eye.   A British Colonel has his heart cut out by Mugwa while he is pinned under his horse.  The movie ‘The Black Robe’ includes a scene where a Jesuit Priest has chucks of his flesh sawed off by an Indian medicine man using a flint knife.  These portrayals of savage torture and killing are true.

In response to Indian warfare the Americans employed technology and shear numbers to defeat the tribes.  While the country called for the total elimination of all Indian tribes in the West, Christian’s morality called for mercy and an attempt of civilizing the tribes.

The creation of Indian reservations and missionary establishments in Indians Country was a unpopular cause, but the humanitarians prevailed.  The mere fact the Indians were not totally removed by warfare from the face of the earth gives tribute to the Christian influence of principled convictions of the Founding Fathers and disputes the use of the word ‘genocide’ by Indian historical apologists. 

Today hatred of terrorists in Iraq is an expected reaction.  This call for revenge is a healthy hatred that insures the survival of the United States.  Without the human response to the dehumanizing and butchering of Americans we are lost as a nation and a people.

If we do not hate the actions of terrorists and those who support them we essentially condone their actions and can expect the terrorists to expand their terror to the United States.  I encourage Americans to demand the eradication at any cost to the nation of Iraq until the terrorist cause is ground into the bloody dirt of the Middle East.  I also encourage the history of this war never to be forgotten in our schools and national archive.  This hate we feel today needs to be tempered by revenge and not appeasement or retreat.

By Bruce Woodhull 6/24/06  

Article Comments?

Another Terrorist Pig Down In Flames!

 

Get Ready For Some Liberals & Other Total Morons To Start Wearing His Picture On Their T-Shirts...

MY INDIGENOUS PEOPLE CAN BEAT UP YOUR INDIGENOUS PEOPLE

     The new catch phase for pan-patriots on the left is ‘Indigenous People’.
Indigenous people from Mexico are claiming they are the core of America’s greatness.
The indigenous people built, cleaned, landscaped, cooked and provided recipients for welfare in America. Soon there will be a door-to-door candy bar sale campaign by indigenous people. Don’t be shocked if the indigenous descendants of the Aztecs take credit for open-heart surgery. Competition Wading will be an indigenous Summer Olympic sport. Some Hollywood type will probably create a new reality show pitting a bunch of indigenous peoples together in an Indigenous Triathlon. The competitors will compete in a northern migration from Mexico into the United States. The winner will receive a million dollars and a series of deodorant commercials. 

I find it odd that all these indigenous humanitarians have abandoned the real indigenous peoples of Mexico. The Mexican government has no love for Mexican Indians. Human Rights commissions have confronted the Mexican government with countless accusations of cruelty and racism against Indians in Mexico. I guess in all the protest fanfare on the streets of Los Angeles seeks to forget the plight of real indigenous peoples south of the border. It wouldn’t look good for the indigenous spokespersons for America’s new crop of indigenous peoples to admit anything negative about Mexico. They’re goal is to ‘Mexicanize’ the United States. Do the new indigenous leaders from Mexico intend to seek out America’s indigenous people for exceptional treatment like the Indians in Mexico receive? If these people are indigenous Mexicans; why would they want to recreate the poverty and corruption of Mexico? 

If I had to compare treatment and protection of native rights between the United States and Mexico; I’d say indigenous people in the United States are treated better than indigenous Mexicans. I’m not forgetting or excusing the history of Native Americans and their treatment by the government of the United States. Nor do I deny their own history of pre-historic weaponry and warfare against each other. But today in the United States, Native Americans fare much better than Mexican Indians. Protesting and marching in the United States is a fairly safe undertaking for pro-illegal activists. I wonder how the Mexican government would receive such a protest march in Mexico?
I’d have more respect for some off these Hispanic pro-illegal activists if they told the truth about conditions for Indians in Mexico. I’d also like to see Mexico’s indigenous peoples attempt to occupy Indian Country in the United States. Knowing the resolve and survival instinct of Native Americans living on reservations, protecting their casinos and government entitlements; I’d wager my indigenous people could beat up your indigenous people.

By Bruce Woodhull 5/5/06

CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR OBAMA QUESTIONS LEGALITY OF SLAVERY BAN

This week, Barack Obama's challenge is to select a running mate who's young, hip, and whose accomplishments in life don't overshadow Obama's. Allow me to suggest Kevin Federline. 

The only thing we can be sure of is that Obama will choose someone who is the polar opposite of all his advisers until now. In other words, it will be a very, very white male who was probably proud of his country even before being chosen as Obama's running mate. 

Obama's got a lot of ground to make up following that performance last weekend at the Saddleback presidential forum with pastor Rick Warren. 

After seeing Obama defend infanticide with the glib excuse that the question of when life begins is above his "pay-grade," Rev. Jeremiah Wright announced that although he's known Obama for 30 years, he only recently became aware of how extreme the senator's viewpoints were. Wright, after all, has his reputation to consider. 

Network heads responded by dashing off an urgent memo: During the main presidential debates this fall, ask NO questions about abortion, ethics or evil! Morality isn't the Democrats' forte. 

Obama's defenders spin his abominable performance in the Saddleback forum by saying he's just too smart to give a straight answer. As Rick Warren charitably described Obama's debate performance: "He likes to nuance things ... He's a constitutional attorney." The constitutional lawyer "does nuance," as Bill Maher said on "Larry King Live," "and you saw how well that goes over with the Rick Warren people." 

If that's Obama's excuse, he ought to know a few basics about the Constitution. 

Did the big constitutional lawyer whose "nuance" is too sophisticated for Rick Warren's audience see the letter his wife sent out on his behalf in 2004? Michelle Obama denounced a federal law banning partial-birth abortion, writing that "this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional." Clearly! 

The Supreme Court later found the law not "unconstitutional," but "constitutional" -- which I believe may have been the precise moment when Michelle Obama realized just how ashamed she had always been of her country. 

But most stunningly, when Warren asked Obama if he supported a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman, Obama said he did not "because historically -- because historically, we have not defined marriage in our Constitution." 

I don't care if you support a marriage amendment or not. That answer is literally the stupidest thing I've ever heard anyone say. If marriage were already defined in the Constitution, we wouldn't need an amendment, no? 

Say, you know what else was "historically" not defined in the Constitution? Slavery. The words "slavery" and "slave" do not appear once in the original Constitution. The framers correctly thought it would sully the freedom-enshrining document to acknowledge the repellent practice. (Much like abortion!) 

But in 1865, the 13th Amendment banned slavery throughout the land, in the first constitutional phrase ever to mention "slavery": "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." 

On Obama's "historical" argument, they shouldn't have passed the 13th Amendment because the Constitution "historically" had not mentioned slavery. 

Do we know for a fact Barack Obama has read the Constitution? Obama's Facebook profile: "I'm pro-infanticide, I love sunsets, and I don't get the 13th Amendment!" 

This is the guy who thinks he can condescend to Clarence Thomas? Asked at the Saddleback forum which Supreme Court justice Obama would not have nominated, Obama said ... the black one! 

In Obama's defense, he said he thought Thomas wasn't experienced enough "at the time." So I guess Obama thinks Thomas should have to "wait his turn." 

By contrast, Obama has experience pouring out of those big ears of his. Asked last year by Robin Roberts on ABC's "Good Morning America" about his lack of experience in foreign policy, Obama took umbrage. 

Swelling up his puny little chest, Obama said: "Well, actually, my experience in foreign policy is probably more diverse than most others in the field. I'm somebody who has actually lived overseas, somebody who has studied overseas. I majored in international relations." 

He actually cited his undergraduate major as a qualification to be president. 

But on Saturday night, Obama said he didn't think Clarence Thomas was a "strong enough jurist or legal thinker" to be put on the Supreme Court. 

I bet Thomas has heard of the 13th Amendment! 

by Ann Coulter, August 20, 2008

COPYRIGHT 2008 ANN COULTER 

Death by Democracy

Unwanted Freedom

Clearly, based upon the voting habits of the average American ever since FDR introduced Big Brother’s “New ( Nanny State ) Deal,” freedom is just too tough for the average American. That’s the only way to explain why Americans are voting themselves back into bondage in an effort to trade their freedom for free-stuff.  

Freedom is worth less than free-stuff. Who knew, besides Marx and Lenin? It turns out that the father of Socialism Karl Marx was right, “Democracy is the road to socialism,” - at least in any nation where the people are ill-informed of history and apathetic towards their future.  

I have often pondered the logic of our Founders who saw fit to lay the future of the greatest free nation ever known to mankind in the hands of folks unable to read history, much less write it. In the end, it seems that entrusting freedom and individual liberty to folks who can’t even manage their own household might have been a silly notion.  

Unable to Manage Personal Health  

We must have government controlled socialized medicine. But since Americans don’t like the word socialism, we’ll have to call it something else. Maybe we’ll call it Universal Health Care. That sounds much better than socialized medicine, don’t you think?  

Unable to Manage Personal Wealth  

We have a “graduated tax” system by which we can legally confiscate privately earned assets “from each according to his ability” and redistribute them “to each according to his need.” Since this idea was also hatched by Karl Marx, we call it a “graduated income tax” so that nobody will notice what it really is. We’ll trade our unalienable individual right to define and pursue (earn) happiness for some government enforced greater good.  

Unable to Manage Our Sexual Appetite  

We are trading the unalienable individual right to life for more progressive conveniences. Since free-sex often results in unplanned parenthood, we’ll have to legalize a special kind of murder that only mothers are allowed to commit. We’ll call it “abortion” so that people won’t know it’s an innocent child being murdered. And since free-sex also tends to result in unplanned life threatening sexually transmitted disease, we’ll need a federal budget to take care of those who can’t take care of themselves once they contract those diseases. And last, since free-sex includes anyone or anything, we will need to re-define the term “marriage” so that everyone has equal access to all the government handouts designed to promote only the traditional family unit.  

Unable to Manage Our Work Habits and Productivity  

We need some ex-organized crime bosses to head up a few labor unions so that they can make sure that the least productive employees get their fair share of payroll and vacation time at the expense of those willing to do the work of three men. We’ll give up our right to succeed to avoid our right to fail.  

Unable to Keep Up with Politics  

We won’t waste time trying to read up on history or current events. It’s all just too frustrating and confusing anyway. We’ll just let union bosses use a portion of our individual earnings to buy the politicians they think we need. If that doesn’t work, they can always buy another one. Politicians are always for sale, some of them, pretty cheap. If we don’t belong to a labor union, we’ll just send a few bucks to the national committee of choice and hope for the best.  

Unable to Manage a Family

With our divorce rate now over 50 percent, and every household needing two incomes just to have life after taxes, children are raising themselves. Since we failed at managing the traditional family unit, it will indeed take a village to keep our kids out of prison or worse.  

Unable to Compete in the World  

Great competitors thrive on competition; they don’t run or hide from it. Though America was once the home of the greatest competitors on earth, those days are gone. Since we can’t compete with the world anymore, we seek to withdraw from the world, take our football and go home, outlaw or at the very least, use government restraints to keep other nations from outshining American productivity in the free market. We need to isolate ourselves from those who now out-produce us with better products at lower prices. It’s the only way we can return to being a big fish in our own little pond.  

I can keep going, subject after subject, and so can you. Clearly, the average person, even in America , is not well suited for self-governance, self-reliance or self-determination.  

In light of this news, it’s clear that freedom and liberty is one of those dangerous things that one should not try at home, even in America . The land of the free belonged to the brave, who were willing to risk failure in pursuit of success. According to the voting stats, that was generations ago, before average Americans opted for FDR’s Nanny State Deal and threw in the towel on individual freedom and liberty.  

Oh sure, we talk about loving freedom and demanding individual liberty. But when push comes to shove, we vote against these ideas and in favor of government issued economic security which can only exist in an environment whereby we take “from each according to his ability” and redistribute “to each according to his need.”  

Unwanted Freedom  

Real freedom is tough. Individual freedom comes with a few unsavory friends, namely individual responsibility and natural consequences for both our actions and our inactions. The right to succeed brings with it the inherent right to fail. The right to make choices brings with it the possibility of making bad choices. The right to make even bad choices carries with it the right to face the natural consequences of those choices.  

It’s all just too hard. That’s why many of our 300 million Americans have opted to entrust their lives and their entire future to just 545 special Americans. They place the entire nation and the personal well-being of 300 million Americans in the hands of just 545 special Americans whom they trust to know best and act in their best interest. Since we have made such a mess of our individual lives, we hope that these 545 special Americans will do a better job of managing the commune than we have done for ourselves.  

545 Special Americans  

One President, one hundred senators, 435 house members and nine Supreme Court judges decide everything today. This is the 545 special Americans entrusted with the total well-being of 300 million American citizens. They are indeed special… they must be.  

Nearly each of the 545 are millionaires, riding in limousines, flying in private jets, living in one or more mansions, wearing only the finest designer cloths and eating at all the best restaurants. Most of them were all but broke before grabbing the brass ring of federal office, but they will never be broke again. 300 million average Americans have seen to that.  

They write and re-write via interpretation, the laws they live above and they now decide what is best for every American since the average American has traded their freedom of choice for free-stuff from the public trough.  

It’s called an oligarchy and becoming one of the special 545 is easy. It’s a matter of knowing how best to pander to the desires of the electorate always in search of more free stuff. There are only 545 positions available, but anyone who can pander to the people fluently, can have one of these positions, even if they have a resume void of achievement like Barack Obama, a life long career of crime and corruption like Hillary Clinton or decades of working against fundamental American principles like John McCain.  

These 545 are very special. They are not held to any standard at all, so long as they can tell the people what they hope to hear, that more gifts from the public trough await them, and we won’t even be saddled with those difficult conditions inherent with personal freedom.  

This is the New American Dream  

The old American Dream of individual liberty and personal freedom at any cost has been traded for a more progressive American Dream of free-stuff at any cost, in search of a peaceful life free from natural individual consequences for the choices we used to make individually.  

Individual freedom has been traded for a greater communal good whereby every American will be given a government issued economic floor in exchange for accepting the government imposed ceiling that must come with it.  

Sure, it’s socialism. But it’s Democratic Socialism because every American voted for it, or failed to vote against it. America always has the government it deserves because it always has the government it elected.  

The majority of Americans no longer trust themselves with freedom, individual liberty and the burden of natural consequences for their choices. So they turn those decisions over to the 545 special Americans they elected to take care of every detail.  

It’s not American… But it is democratic! Welcome to the new improved progressive America

Written by JB Williams ©2008 USA  

The Value of Venezuela

 The value of Venezuela puzzles me. I sit here and listen to the self-proclaimed culturally diverse shrug off threats of death and implementations of communism for culture, music and food. I can’t help but be disturbed by their ignorance. Calling Hugo Chavez anything but the next Stalin is like saying Al Gore truly cares about polar ice.

Hugo has recently declared a South American jihad against America. I know that term doesn’t sit well with some people, especially Venezuelan immigrants, but too bad. If you don’t like it go tell Hugo to shut up.

I thought of my personal value to Venezuela if I was ever forbidden to go there. Oh, somehow I just can’t see the loss. Ya know, kind of like getting “re-robbed” in New Orleans. 

President Hugo Chavez has recently over run his big mouth and has begun bashing America again. As if his tirade at the last United Nations assembly wasn’t enough. He recently spoke to his army and ordered them to prepare themselves for guerrilla warfare against America. He spoke among banners that said “Fatherland, Socialism or Death! We will triumph”! 
Funny, the last time I heard the words “Fatherland, Socialism, and Triumph” all in the same sentence, 
6 million unarmed Jews died. 

Liberals will come to the rescue of Chavez, and his Fidel Castro following, his socialist vomit and hypocrisy.
They will quickly forget that capitalism is what got him where he is, president of his country and worth billions. 
What liberals and proponents for Socialism don’t know is that Russia just sold 100,000 AK-47s , 53 combat helicopters, and 24 fighter jets to this Hitler wanna-be. The scary thing is that you’ve got to want to be before you can be. This guy has all the makings of a totalitarian freak. We’d better give him a preliminary punch in the nose or we’re going to be in trouble.

Anyone who keeps up with the news knows that Chavez owns Citgo. Citgo, soon to be named Petro Express, possesses a massive amount of gas stations across the United States and is amassing a fortune in U.S. currency while bashing America and stating that he wants to kill Americans citizens. If we need a war so badly, why go all the way to Iran? Hell, we’ve got one across the border! I mean, it’s bad enough that I am subservient to those middle easterners who want me dead at the same time as they sell me oil, but now Venezuelans want me dead too? Come on, when is America going to wake up? It’s as though we are the big kid on the block that every body wants to fight. We continue to tolerate threats from the likes of Korea, Iran, Iraq, India and Mexico. Now Venezuela? We must stand up, defeat these threats and say “Who’s next?” 

We have created our own demise. We are addicted to oil. We have to ask ourselves when are we going to stop being pushed around. Why are we becoming so apologetic for our very existence? We are reluctantly funding and paving the way for a socialist empire to take us over.

I am in no way a conspiracy theorist, but if just half of the socialist / communist countries wanted to hurt us and take us over we would lose the battle by population alone. Not to mention the traitors we have here on Capitol Hill opening the revolving door to our borders even wider with their amnesty agenda.

Chavez has warned Americans that he will unleash secret operatives / sleeper cells that are hiding in the U.S. 
A Central American based street gang called MS-13 is reportedly the most powerful gang in the world.
Chavez has spoken proudly about his ties with them and a million-dollar donation to Al-Queda. 

Paris Hilton being jailed isn’t my priority. Protecting my country is! America, you had better wake up.
Your government has already proven they can’t and won’t protect you. 

So in asking myself “my” value to Venezuela, I realize that I have one, it’s called $ 2.95 a gallon. Every time I pay it, the value of Venezuela goes up. You can wait until Venezuela freezes over before I give another penny to Chavez while he funds the future attack on my kids. Shame on you if you buy from Citgo.

By Sean M. Sullivan

One Nation, Under Men, With Liberty for few and Justice for None... 

Am I the only American left who does not care at all what happens to Paris Hilton? With all that is going on (going wrong) in our world today, I am amazed at how much press coverage we can afford to give one little spoiled party girl. I intended to be the only writer in America who did not write about Paris Hilton this week, yet here I am, forced to write about Paris anyway. 

Am I the only one left in America who is sane enough to see something horribly disturbing about these two headlines? US Court Orders Release Of Enemy Combatant From Military Detention and Paris Hilton Ordered Back To Jail… 

Do I understand this correctly? Spoiled little rich snobs caught speeding without a drivers license must do hard time, but members of Al Qaeda and enemy combatants must go free? 

To put a finer point on it, our courts, our justice system, has decreed that Paris Hilton is more dangerous to America than foreign terrorists plotting inside America to attack American interests through numerous equally devastating tactics. 

I’m sure some sniveling liberal will be fast to point out that Hilton has been afforded her civil rights of a speedy trial, which ended with a conviction and seemingly fair sentence, while all suspected terrorists sitting in Gitmo have been afforded no such favor. 

Must I point out that our constitution is not an international document, that our courts are not international courts and that our laws are not international laws? That our justice system in designed for civilized Americans not international enemy combatants? Or that our courts are no longer suited for jay-walkers, much less terrorists…? 

To the best of anyone’s knowledge, Paris Hilton is not plotting to destroy anything more than a good party, while those enjoying free room and board at Gitmo would like nothing better than to rearrange our continent and eliminate our entire way of life, reducing our